Sunday, June 7. 2009The housing market is not the US SenateComments
Display comments as
(Linear | Threaded)
Whilst the argument against equal weighting is valid the data still highlights an interesting point. A more interesting analysis would compare various states on a graph like the one above. Some of the states that have seen annualised rises or only modest falls in the bear market had some of the lowest rises in the bull market. If as a whole the US is at 1976 levels how does that look on a state by state basis?
Interesting, but probably not too exciting unless you live in a given state or metro area. For those who do, nothing I can do will beat state-level house-price series or Case-Shiller market-range segmentations.
What I can add when I find a few moments is a weighted histogram of these quarterly state-level returns. It will be ugly once you highlight recent periods, but I wonder how ugly. Fingers crossed I muster the energy.
I find it interesting that the peak of this chart appears to be 100% but if you look at the last time you posted the chart, the peak was ~160%. How does the scale of historic data change? If the answer is revision of data, then I have very little faith in the current figures give the revision in priors
Equity equals assets only in the limit case. If owners equity is less than 100%, the numerators differ. Here equity is below 100% throughout the entire period. Click through this chart to the Flow of Funds; equity at 08Q4 was 43%.
That said, I am highly sympathetic to suspecting data revision. That's why we have http://alfred.stlouisfed.org |
QuicksearchCategoriesBlog Administration |
Tracked: Jun 09, 11:49